CARBON DEATH CULTSYSTEM FAILURE AUDITCOUNTER-DESIGN PROJECT
BLUEPRINTPUBLIC SURVIVAL STANDARD / SPECIFICATION

COUNTER-DESIGN
PROJECT

Turning exposed gaps into practical public survival standards. This is not vague optimism or corporate ESG. It is evidence-linked replacement logic: what the public record shows is missing, and what should exist instead.

Standards are not invented. They are derived from documented public evidence gaps in the System Failure Audit.

01
EXPOSE

Carbon Death Cult maps the actors, relationships, and flows sustaining fossil-fuel systems.

02
AUDIT

The System Failure Audit records what the public evidence does and does not show about systemic-failure planning.

03
COUNTER-DESIGN

The Counter-Design Project specifies what should exist: minimum standards, fair allocation, and scarcity governance.

VIEW SYSTEM FAILURE AUDIT →
PUBLIC SURVIVAL STANDARDS / ACTIVE SPECIFICATIONS4 STANDARDS PUBLISHED
local food continuityCDC-CDP-01

Local Food Continuity Guarantee

Just-in-time supply chains are vulnerable to systemic stress. Published evidence shows no public continuity plan for prolonged food disruption in multiple audited areas.

3 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTSVIEW SPEC →
housing protectionCDC-CDP-02

Public Survival Standard — Housing Continuity

If displacement occurs concurrently with fuel, transport and communications failure, existing emergency housing frameworks may not specify fair allocation or anti-hoarding measures.

3 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTSVIEW SPEC →
communicationsCDC-CDP-03

Communications Resilience Minimum

Published communications continuity planning is often limited to single-system failure, not concurrent infrastructure collapse.

3 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTSVIEW SPEC →
energy minimum guaranteeCDC-CDP-04

Energy Minimum Guarantee

Energy system cascading failure is rarely named as a distinct risk class in public resilience documents.

3 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTSVIEW SPEC →
UK / EUROPE APPLICATION

Focuses on Local Resilience Forums, local authorities, and national strategic reserves. Emphasises public accountability, equitable distribution protocols, and devolved administration escalation triggers.

GLOBAL APPLICATION

Focuses on regional food sovereignty pacts, international disruption-relief agreements, and large-scale systemic adaptations with host-nation guarantees.